<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lomonline Blog &#187; Msn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lomonline.de/category/msn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lomonline.de</link>
	<description>Lomonline Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:09:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>MSN Hit By Canonical URL Problems</title>
		<link>http://blog.lomonline.de/msn-hit-by-canonical-url-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lomonline.de/msn-hit-by-canonical-url-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 04:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Msn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lomonline.de/msn-hit-by-canonical-url-problems/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MSN’s homepage &#8211; www.msn.com is now showing a toolbar PR of 2. This is another example of the canonical problem I covered in an earlier post. Looking up the link information for msn.com and www.msn.com, you can see that Google considers these two different urls. In order to correct this problem, MSN could redirect msn.com [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MSN’s homepage &#8211; www.msn.com is now showing a toolbar PR of 2.</p>
<p>This is another example of the canonical problem I covered in an earlier post. Looking up the link information for msn.com and www.msn.com, you can see that Google considers these two different urls. In order to correct this problem, MSN could redirect msn.com to www.msn.com with a 301 redirect, but instead they used a 302.</p>
<p>I’m sure MSN understands the problem behind using a 302 and may be using this as a way to highlight the issues Google has with canonical urls.</p>
<p>Hopefully Google will respond to this and fix the problem for all sites that have been affected &#8211; not just a big site like MSN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lomonline.de/msn-hit-by-canonical-url-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft to offer book search</title>
		<link>http://blog.lomonline.de/microsoft-to-offer-book-search/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lomonline.de/microsoft-to-offer-book-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Msn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lomonline.de/microsoft-to-offer-book-search/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft joins book search plan Microsoft has joined a Yahoo-backed effort to digitise the world’s books and other works to make them searchable and accessible to anyone online.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pc-news.org/microsoft-joins-book-search-plan/internet-news/">Microsoft joins book search plan</a><br />
Microsoft has joined a Yahoo-backed effort to digitise the world’s books and other works to make them searchable and accessible to anyone online. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lomonline.de/microsoft-to-offer-book-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
